On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 16:54, Joerg Sonnenberger <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 03:09:05PM +0000, Hans Wennborg wrote: >> The attached patch makes -Wformat-non-standard warn about the use of >> positional arguments (e.g. "%3$d") in format strings. (pr12017) > > It sounds wrong to use -Wformat-non-standard for those, since they are > covered by POSIX.
Looking at http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/functions/printf.html, it seems that so are the 'S' and 'C' conversion specifiers. Do you have a better name suggestion for the flag? The intention was that it should mean "non-standard" as in "non ISO C standard". Thanks, Hans _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
