On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 1:44 PM, Chris Lattner <[email protected]> wrote:
> This needs to be documented in the clang user's manual and release notes. > Agreed, but I think that might be good to leave until the runtime and the rest of the infrastructure becomes more clear? I was imagining this is still early-stage development. Is there a good place to document features in-progress but specifically not ready for prime-time? > > -Chris > > On Mar 1, 2012, at 12:05 PM, Kostya Serebryany wrote: > > ping. > (fresh patch which applies to r151830 attached). > > > On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Kostya Serebryany <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Please review the following clang patch that adds a >> flag -fthread-sanitizer. >> This flag enables ThreadSanitizer instrumentation committed to llvm as >> r150423. >> The patch includes one test for -fthread-sanitizer and one similar test >> for -faddress-sanitizer. >> This patch does not modify the linker flags (as we do it >> for -faddress-sanitizer) because the run-time library is not yet >> committed and it's structure in compiler-rt is not 100% clear. >> >> http://codereview.appspot.com/5663045/ >> >> Thanks, >> >> --kcc >> > > <issue5663045_2001.diff>_______________________________________________ > > cfe-commits mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits > > > > _______________________________________________ > cfe-commits mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits > >
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
