r151858, thanks! On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 3:17 PM, Chandler Carruth <[email protected]>wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 3:13 PM, Kostya Serebryany <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> >> On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 3:10 PM, Chandler Carruth <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 2:48 PM, Kostya Serebryany <[email protected]>wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> Please review the following patch to the UsersManual.html >>>> I've inserted the two bullets after -fcatch-undefined-behavior >>> >>> >>> Could you include links to more comprehensive documentation about these >>> two tools? In particular for address sanitizer, links to a how-to and >>> limitations etc. >>> >> That's what I did. No? >> > > I am blind and incapable of reading. Please commit patches of this > complexity directly, and I'll post-commit review them. =] > > >> >> Turn on <a href="AddressSanitizer.html">AddressSanitizer</a> >> >> >> >> >>> >>> >>> For thread sanitizer you might explicitly indicate that it is both >>> experimental and not ready for widespread testing? Dunno, not important. >>> >> >> We can express it like this: >> >> <dt id="opt_fthread-sanitizer"><b>-f[no-]thread-sanitizer</b>: >> >> >> Turn on ThreadSanitizer, an <em>experimental</em> data race detector. >> >> >> Not ready for widespread use. >> > > SGTM, please commit. >
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
