On Mar 2, 2012, at 1:39 PM, Jay Foad wrote: > On 2 March 2012 20:09, Eli Friedman <[email protected]> wrote: >> I don't think this is really safe; strictly speaking, yes, an int* is >> required to be appropriately aligned, but in practice neither clang >> nor gcc has ever tried to enforce that, so making that assumption is >> going to cause trouble. > > I've had no complaints from buildbots in the last 3 hours. James > Molloy has offered to run some tests on an ARM system that doesn't > tolerate misaligned memory accesses. Can we leave this in for the time > being and see just how much trouble it causes?
Eli and I chatted about this, and I think I convinced him. It should stay in. Thanks Jay! -Chris _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
