On Tue, Mar 06, 2012 at 04:41:48PM -0600, Sebastian Pop wrote: > Joerg, concerning your remark: > > My question still stands. Do you want to emulate the (IMO insane) GCC > > configure option or just provide a default value for --sysroot. If the > > The patch intends to provide a default value to --sysroot: I do not want > to emulate the semantics of GCC's configure flag. > > > latter, the option should be named differently to avoid confusion. > > I don't think this patch really implements this behavior though. > > Please let me know if this current patch addresses your concerns.
LGTM. You might want to do some additional review of hard-coded path names in need of = prefixing, but that is unrelated. Joerg _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
