On Wednesday 04 of April 2012, Matt Beaumont-Gay wrote: > Looking better. [list of improvements and "improvements" skipped]
You know what, I give up. This is ridiculous and I've had enough. Although I have spent quite some time on the patch and really don't like the idea of not upstreaming it and keeping it only for me and whoever else would be interested, I like even less the idea of going through one more iteration of this. I don't think I've ever been treated even close to this when submitting a patch to any of the other projects I've sent a patch to. If you don't want the feature and a possible contributor, you could have just as well said it right at the beginning. If somebody with superpowers sufficient to get past this inquisition session would feel like taking over the patch, just go ahead. I don't think there's any technical problem with it and I've been using it extensively in the last few weeks (and I'd be willing to have a look at it if somebody finds an actual technical problem in it after all). This has been a good example to me of how not to treat patch submissions from possible new contributors and I'll make sure to keep it in mind when accepting patches for the projects I care for, so thanks at least for the lesson. -- Lubos Lunak [email protected] _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
