On 11 Apr 2012, at 16:46, Chandler Carruth wrote: > It seems like this should get an ext-warn...
In which case we'd get a load of them for anything using libc++. > Is there not an existing test for _Atomic as used in C++ that this could be > folded into? $ grep _Atomic test/CodeGenCXX/* atomicinit.cpp: _Atomic(int) i; So, no. This test should be growing a bit soon, once I fix the issue with __atomic_init() with C++ types. David _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
