> This model doesn't make any sense to me. It would make sense if > the templated thing were just the class; but actually, the class and > all of its members and their members recursively are all templated. > > I think you're asking for a significantly weirder language model > based on some idea of cleanliness of implementation, and I don't > understand the motivation at all.
I am not too attached to this particular case, but it does falls naturally. I have a small concern that if a users writes an explicit attribute in a class member, he will find it surprising when it gets overwritten. In any case, this is not the main point of the patch, so I will just change this case so that the template argument affects members too. > John. Cheers, Rafael _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
