Chandler, thank you to notify me. I have marked it as XFAIL for now.
As you say, it would not make sense. It would be worse since "gcc -f(no-)math-errno %.s" is passed to gcc-as. ...Takumi 2012/4/27 Chandler Carruth <[email protected]>: > On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 9:36 PM, NAKAMURA Takumi <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> Author: chapuni >> Date: Thu Apr 26 23:36:27 2012 >> New Revision: 155691 >> >> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=155691&view=rev >> Log: >> test/Driver/fast-math.c: Mark this as XFAIL:cygming. They use gcc driver >> for as. > > > XFAILing the whole thing doesn't make sense though. Most of this test is > checking the interactions of the Clang driver and CC1... What is the actual > problem here? > >> >> >> Modified: >> cfe/trunk/test/Driver/fast-math.c >> >> Modified: cfe/trunk/test/Driver/fast-math.c >> URL: >> http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/test/Driver/fast-math.c?rev=155691&r1=155690&r2=155691&view=diff >> >> ============================================================================== >> --- cfe/trunk/test/Driver/fast-math.c (original) >> +++ cfe/trunk/test/Driver/fast-math.c Thu Apr 26 23:36:27 2012 >> @@ -4,6 +4,9 @@ >> // LLVM only supports three switches which is more coarse grained than >> GCC's >> // support. >> // >> +// Both of them use gcc driver for as. >> +// XFAIL: cygwin,mingw32 >> +// >> // RUN: %clang -### -fno-honor-infinities -c %s 2>&1 \ >> // RUN: | FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-INFS %s >> // CHECK-NO-INFS: "-cc1" >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> cfe-commits mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits > > _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
