On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 10:49 PM, Anders Waldenborg
<[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, May 02, 2012 at 08:29:05PM +0200, Manuel Klimek wrote:
>> Call it underlying_type instead then? That would also document the 
>> intention...
>
> Thanks for review.
>
> underlying_type indeed is better. Updated patch attached. Also changed
> "chld" in the test.

So that was originally patch number 5 right? :) I'm getting confused,
but this one looks good to me!

Cheers,
/Manuel
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to