On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 10:47 AM, Chad Rosier <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> On May 3, 2012, at 10:37 AM, Chandler Carruth wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 10:07 AM, Chad Rosier <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Author: mcrosier
>> Date: Thu May  3 12:07:55 2012
>> New Revision: 156079
>>
>> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=156079&view=rev
>> Log:
>> [driver crash diagnostics] Remove more flags that reference absolute
>> paths that
>> aren't necessary to reproduce the clang crash.
>>
>
> Out of curiosity, is it easy to test this by triggering a crash in the
> test suite, and then FileCheck-ing the resulting repro stuff?
>
>
> In r155205 (http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?view=rev&revision=155205)
> I added a simple hack to cause the compiler to crash on demand.  We could
> add a test case to cause a crash, but what were checking is the contents of
> the generated script file, which has a non-deterministic name.  You'd have
> to grep the name from the clang output and then FileCheck the output
> script.  Doesn't sound too difficult, but since this is off the critical
> path I honestly haven't spent a lot of time trying to get that to work.  I
> can do so if you (or whoever) really think it's necessary.
>

It's not a big deal... I was more thinking if we're going to keep tweaking
this, maybe we should get some testing coverage of it.

If you're interested in testing it, I would just add an environment
variable much like the one you added to force the crash (maybe the same
one?) that forces the output to a particular location.

Actually, now that I think about it, I have a very distinct use case for
exactly such an environment variable... maybe I can write up a patch and
send it your way?
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to