On May 9, 2012, at 1:50 PM, Chandler Carruth wrote:

> On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 12:40 PM, Chad Rosier <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> On May 9, 2012, at 11:30 AM, Chandler Carruth wrote:
> 
>> On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 11:29 AM, Chandler Carruth <[email protected]> 
>> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> 2012/5/9 Chad Rosier <[email protected]>
>> Author: mcrosier
>> Date: Wed May  9 13:23:04 2012
>> New Revision: 156493
>> 
>> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=156493&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Update test case for new default of 3.0
>> 
>> Modified:
>>    cfe/trunk/test/Driver/target-triple-deployment.c
>> 
>> Maybe we shouldn't check the version numbers here in specificity, and rely 
>> on the llvm::Triple tests?
>> 
>> To be more clear -- should we not check *which* default version we get, and 
>> just check that we did get a (non-zero) default version? I understand we 
>> want to make sure that the llvm::Triple is in fact being used here.
> 
> Hi Chandler,
> I've added the Triple unittests in llvm revision 156507.
> 
> Awesome.
>  
>  Are you opposed to leaving this test case in place to ensure the driver is 
> working as expected?
> 
> Not at all, i like having this test.

Cool beans.

> 
> I was only wondering if we wanted to not hard code which version happens to 
> be the default. But honestly, it's not a big deal either way. =] Sorry for 
> explaining things poorly and wasting your time.

No problem at all, Chandler.

 Chad

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to