thanks! r156984. On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 8:30 PM, Matt Beaumont-Gay <[email protected]>wrote:
> Some tiny spelling/grammar nits: > > > +<h2 id="platforms">Supported Platforms</h2> > > +ThreadSanitizer is supported on Linux x86_64 (tested on Ubuntu 10.04). > <BR> > > +Support for MacOS 10.7 (64-bit only) is planed for late 2012. <BR> > > +Support for 32-bit platforms is problematic and not yet planed. > > s/planed/planned/ > > > +<li> ThreadSanitizer uses more real memory than a native run. > > +At the default settings the memory overhead is 9x plus 9Mb per each > thread. > > +Settings with 5x and 3x overhead (but less accurate analysis) are also > available. > > +<li> ThreadSanitizer maps (but not reserves) a lot of virtual address > space. > > "(but does not reserve)" >
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
