Hi Stephen,
> the llvm.fmuladd.* intrinsic is itself a guarantee that the fused > expression would be legal. This should simply say "... that the fused > expression would be efficient." > I meant 'legal' in the sense that the target architecture has a fused multiply-add instruction, since clang will generate llvm.fmuladds regardless of the target. I'll try to think up an alternate way to phrase that. - Lang.
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
