On Jun 13, 2012, at 1:24 PM, Richard Smith wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 1:09 PM, Chandler Carruth <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> But you didn't test the interaction of '--pedantic' and '--no-pedantic', much 
> less '--pedantic' and '-no-pedantic' or '-pedantic' and '--no-pedantic'. =7
> 
> Less =7ly, it looks like -pedantic-errors -no-pedantic will still produce 
> -pedantic errors. Is that what we want? I would have expected -pedantic, 
> -pedantic-errors, -no-pedantic to work analogously to -Wpedantic, 
> -Werror=pedantic, -Wno-pedantic.

Mmm, yes, I can see this.  I'm going to hold off for a bit because we're 
discussing how this should work with -Weverything;  we may want to change how 
we model -pedantic to be a warning flag with some extra semantics.

John.
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to