On Jul 2, 2012, at 13:48 , Chandler Carruth <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 1:45 PM, Jordan Rose <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes, that did it. (Sorry, for no feedback; out at lunch.) > > On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 11:00 AM, Jordan Rose <[email protected]> wrote: > This is not a standalone build, but it is a separate build from LLVM. > > I'm not aware of such a variation? the 'CLANG_BUILT_STANDALONE' is set > explicitly in the cmake files when the Clang tree is built separately from > the LLVM tree. > > > Sorry, I thought a standalone build meant "no LLVM sources available", since > there is a separate case in tests/CMakeLists.txt for that. It looks like it's > supposed to be possible to build Clang merely with LLVM headers and built > products, but that's not what I'm doing. > > Amusingly, I think that what you're describing *is* the standalone mode... :: > shrug :: Do we need a different terminology for when CLANG_PATH_TO_LLVM_SOURCE is empty but CLANG_PATH_TO_LLVM_BUILD is present? (Is that even supported? Eh.) > Unfortunately, even though "check-clang" builds now in standalone mode, it > still prints out PASS messages for everything that passes, > > Wait wait, I think I've seen that. I can try a few blind commits (or mail you > patches) that might help. Patches accepted. :-) I'll try out what you've got locally first.
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
