On Jul 6, 2012, at 10:01 PM, Richard Smith <[email protected]> wrote:
> …but it's arguable whether that really counts, since it's likely many of
> these warnings should have actual flags anyway…
>
> ... and indeed we no longer have any protection against extension warnings
> being added with no explicit flag (other than -Wpedantic, which doesn't seem
> fine-grained enough to be useful). Would it be worthwhile to teach diagtool
> to additionally list diagnostics which are contained directly in the
> 'pedantic' group and include that in our CHECKs, with the intention of
> eventually emptying that list too?
Agreed 100%. Jordan added 'diagtool tree', which allows us to monitor the
transitive closure of stuff under -Wpedantic. We could write a FileCheck test
based on that output. Something more specific might be useful tool (and
include that under list-warnings).
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
