Hi John! Anything wrong with that patch? I got no feedback at all, neither from you nor anybode else. Could anybody tell me if this is correct and if so apply it? Because I already have the next patch ready ;).
Thanks! -- Jonathan Am 14.07.2012 um 12:02 schrieb Jonathan Schleifer: > Am 12.07.2012 um 02:58 schrieb John McCall: > >> I'd be fine with you adding a new predicate (allowsPointerArithmetic()) on >> ObjCRuntime for this, if you then change Sema to use it in all the >> appropriate places. (You seem to have a good feel for how to do this.) You >> should also add another predicate (isSubscriptPointerArithmetic()), with the >> invariant that it's only true if allowsPointerArithmetic() is, which Sema >> would use to decide how to interpret subscripting on ObjC pointers. > > I implemented that now - please see the attached patch. I also added > maintainer information for the ObjFW runtime. > <subscripts.patch> > -- > Jonathan _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
