I agree, this bitmask is getting really confusing. Maybe KEYALL could be defined as (0xffff & ~KEYNOMS).
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 8:22 AM, Anton Korobeynikov <[email protected]> wrote: >> This is intended, KEYNOMS is mean to exclude, it must not be part of >> KEYALL otherwise the code wont work. > Please put a comment then :) > > -- > With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov > Faculty of Mathematics and Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State University > _______________________________________________ > cfe-commits mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits -- João Matos
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
