Ping. On Aug 7, 2012, at 12:48 PM, Chad Rosier wrote:
> All, > Following up on my previous post about MS-style inline assembly [1], the > attached patches add support for a new inline assembly dialect function > attribute. This new attribute is intended to be used by the backend to > determine how the inline asm string should be parsed/printed. The llvm patch > adds the attdialect and inteldialect attributes and also adds a test case to > ensure the IR is correctly parsed, but there is no functional change at this > time. The clang patch adds the attdialect attribute to GNU-style inline > assembly statements with a test case. There was some discussion of adding an > asmdialect attribute that accepted an optional argument (e.g., asmdialect > "intel", asmdialect "att"), but this looks to add a great deal of complexity > to the attribute handling with minimal benefit. > > Chad > > [1] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2012-August/052356.html) > > <inline-asm-attr-clang.txt><inline-asm-attr-llvm.txt>_______________________________________________ > cfe-commits mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
