On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 4:45 PM, Douglas Gregor <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Aug 8, 2012, at 11:38 AM, Dmitri Gribenko <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 4:43 PM, Douglas Gregor <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> This uncached search seems a bit pessimistic. Why not peek into the cache
>>> for each of the redeclarations, to avoid repeatedly performing the
>>> unchanged search. Then, when we actually do find a raw comment attached to
>>> one of the declarations, update the cache for each of the redeclarations to
>>> point at that same raw comment?
>>
>> I've implemented your suggestion. Unfortunately, this required some
>> code restructuring in order not to re-parse one RawComment when it is
>> attached to multiple redeclarations.
>
> This looks great, thanks!
Thank you for reviewing, committed r161722.
Dmitri
--
main(i,j){for(i=2;;i++){for(j=2;j<i;j++){if(!(i%j)){j=0;break;}}if
(j){printf("%d\n",i);}}} /*Dmitri Gribenko <[email protected]>*/
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
