On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 2:01 PM, Richard Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > According to the documentation I can find[1], multiple __asm constructs are > separate statements. In particular, the documentation suggests that here: > > void f() { > if (false) > __asm mov eax, ebx > __asm mov ebx, eax > } > > the second __asm statement is not controlled by the 'if'. If the > documentation is correct, we currently misparse this. > > [1] http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/45yd4tzz(v=vs.110).aspx
I think clang's interpretation is actually right here, but someone should actually try that on MSVC. -Eli _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
