On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 5:45 PM, Alexander Kornienko <[email protected]> wrote: > Now it's a bit uglier, but doesn't use CommandLine Library in an unsupported > way. > Chandler, please take a look if it seems better to you.
After a short discussion off-list we came to the conclusion that tooling::CommonOptionsParser is a better name for the class, and especially makes the responsibilities clearer... > BTW, we still have a number of alien options defined in some llvm libraries > we link with. Should we try to avoid that by de-globalizing cl library or is > someone working on its replacement/refactoring now? _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
