This adds __mips__ in 4 different places. I understand that there is
already some duplication for _mips (for example), but could this be
factored to a protected method in a base class?

On 23 August 2012 00:48, Jonathan Gray <[email protected]> wrote:
> Here is a patch to add __foo__ type defines for mips which
> were otherwise missing.  Matches what gcc was producing on
> OpenBSD/sgi (mips64eb).
>
> _______________________________________________
> cfe-commits mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
>
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to