This looks pretty reasonable, but the testcase probably doesn't need to have a printf call in it.
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 3:57 PM, Michael Liao <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi > > The attached patch fixes PR13704 which is caused by the missing sign > when increments (1 or -1) are created for types larger than 64-bit > integer. > > Yours > - Michael > > > _______________________________________________ > cfe-commits mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits > _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
