On Aug 28, 2012, at 3:18 PM, Chandler Carruth wrote: > I've added an explanatory comment. Hopefully won't get stale. > > Any other comments? I'd love to get this into the tree as we're seeing actual > races in the wild due to it....
If you would like a fast review, perhaps a more minimal change would have been in order. We're not going to rush into a total rewrite of bitfield IR-generation, especially not one that introduces a host of new assumptions and dependencies on a very general but poorly-specified IR feature that has not previously been used in code with binary compatibility requirements. John. _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
