On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 12:33 PM, Daniel Dunbar <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 12:32 PM, Chandler Carruth <[email protected]> > wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 11:53 AM, Daniel Dunbar <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >> On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 11:23 AM, David Blaikie <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > Daniel (& anyone else), > >> > > >> > Do you know if the documentation here ( > >> > http://llvm.org/docs/TestingGuide.html#rtcustom / > >> > > >> > > http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/docs/TestingGuide.html?view=diff&r1=36059&r2=36060 > >> > ) is still valid? It doesn't appear to be, since my change below > >> > doesn't do particularly interesting quoting/escaping gymnastics & > >> > seems to work fine. > >> > > >> > Any ideas? Should we update the documentation? Does anyone know > >> > what/when/how/why this changed? > >> > >> What is actually going on here is that the LLVM test suite and the > >> Clang test suite use a different style of test. > >> > >> > >> The LLVM test suite is technically written using Tcl syntax, and the > >> Clang test suite uses shell syntax. The document in question is > >> referring to the LLVM test suite. > > > > > > Is this still true? I tried to switch the LLVM test suite to use the > ShTest > > syntax. I thought I had succeeded. > > Nope, I just never noticed that. Many thanks for whatever awesome > bastard perl creation you used to accomplish that feat. :) And thanks for the reminder to go nuke the tcl stuff... I'll do that this evening.
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
