On 8/31/12 1:43 AM, Tobias Grosser wrote:
On 08/27/2012 01:07 AM, Tobias Grosser wrote:
On 08/25/2012 08:45 AM, Gregory Szorc wrote:
I agree with the sentiment of wanting increased compatibility, but I'm
hesitant that this change is the right answer.
Hi Gregory,
thanks for the feedback.
[..] (A long reply, discussing clang compatibility strategies)
I updated the patch according to your comments. The patch does now
provide an informative error message, if a method cannot be found in
libclang.so:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
[cindex.py] Add helper to initialize libclang functions
The helper allows us to define how the initialization of functions
should behave. We use this patch to provide an informative error
message, in case a function is not available:
"LibclangError: /home/grosser/Projekte/llvm/install/lib/libclang.so:
undefined symbol: clang_method_added_in_2020. Please ensure that your
python bindings are compatible with your libclang.so version."
This patch also ensures that no spelling mistakes slip into the library
initialization. At the moment, there are a couple of 'argtype' ->
'argtypes' mispellings that have been overlooked.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cheers
Tobi
You sold me. This looks good to me.
My only nit would be around the len(item) checking. I'd do it after
function detection and assign to func immediately after the len() check.
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
