On Sep 6, 2012, at 14:54 , John McCall <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sep 6, 2012, at 1:37 PM, Jordan Rose wrote: >> Author: jrose >> Date: Thu Sep 6 15:37:08 2012 >> New Revision: 163348 >> >> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=163348&view=rev >> Log: >> [analyzer] Don't attempt to devirtualize calls to base class destructors. > > Or rather, such a call is inherently non-virtual. Presumably you already > have some way to represent a non-virtual destructor call? It's possible to > request this explicitly, e.g.: > foo->A::~A();
I actually have no idea what happens here. Or even for 'foo->A::bar()'. I'll have to look into that. Thanks, John. Jordan _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
