On Oct 1, 2012, at 11:39 AM, Jordan Rose <[email protected]> wrote:
> If you are making these accessors non-const, we should probably remove the > const_casts as well. I had them as const initially because they were > conceptually const (they didn't change the observable state of the object as > long as you always used the accessors), but I can see how that's less true > now. Yeah. I was still mulling over the const'ness thing here, but if we go with removing the const'ness we should do so completely.
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
