Hi,
Was there any interest in this patch? Please let me know if there are any
changes that should be made, or whether it is good to be committed? (or even
whether I was barking up the wrong tree...?!)
(If any were unable to receive the patch -- I know that sometimes Apple
users have problems with my attachments! -- then it can be viewed directly
at
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/cfe-commits/attachments/20121002/824367ac/attachment-0001.obj)
Cheers
Andy
On Tuesday, October 02, 2012 5:32 PM, Andy Gibbs wrote:
All,
Attached is a patch that adds an 'expected-no-diagnostics' directive
to -verify. This can then be used, as discussed, to flag files that are
not
expected to produce any diagnostics at all. -verify has then been changed
to generate an error if no expected-* directives are found (for example,
if
the RUN line doesn't specify the source file!). I've also made it so that
the user cannot put 'expected-no-diagnostics' in with other expected-*
directives (to avoid mistakes!).
The complete patch is rather large, but I've grouped the changes to
VerifyDiagnosticConsumer to the top of the file along with the additional
test-case. The rest of the patch makes the necessary changes to fix 580
test-cases which now (in almost all cases) need to have the
'expected-no-diagnostics' directive.
Comments / questions welcome!
Andy
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
