You should be able to test these on the backend side as well yes? -eric
2012/10/24 Chad Rosier <[email protected]>: > Author: mcrosier > Date: Wed Oct 24 17:22:12 2012 > New Revision: 166633 > > URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=166633&view=rev > Log: > [ms-inline asm] Test case for r166632. > > Modified: > cfe/trunk/test/CodeGen/ms-inline-asm.c > > Modified: cfe/trunk/test/CodeGen/ms-inline-asm.c > URL: > http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/test/CodeGen/ms-inline-asm.c?rev=166633&r1=166632&r2=166633&view=diff > ============================================================================== > --- cfe/trunk/test/CodeGen/ms-inline-asm.c (original) > +++ cfe/trunk/test/CodeGen/ms-inline-asm.c Wed Oct 24 17:22:12 2012 > @@ -163,3 +163,19 @@ > // CHECK: call void asm sideeffect inteldialect ".byte 0x43", > "~{dirflag},~{fpsr},~{flags}"() nounwind > // CHECK: call void asm sideeffect inteldialect ".byte 0x4B", > "~{dirflag},~{fpsr},~{flags}"() nounwind > } > + > +struct t18_type { int a, b; }; > + > +int t18() { > + struct t18_type foo; > + foo.a = 1; > + foo.b = 2; > + __asm { > + lea ebx, foo > + mov eax, [ebx].0 > + mov [ebx].4, ecx > + } > + return foo.b; > +// CHECK: t18 > +// CHECK: call void asm sideeffect inteldialect "lea ebx, foo\0A\09mov eax, > [ebx].0\0A\09mov [ebx].4, ecx", "~{eax},~{dirflag},~{fpsr},~{flags}"() > nounwind > +} > > > _______________________________________________ > cfe-commits mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
