On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 6:32 AM, Mahesha HS <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Hal and Ron,
>
> Here is possibilities, for -fopenmp and -fno-openmp combinations. Is
> it looks okay?
>
> 1. Neither -fopenmp nor -fno-openmp is passed.
> if (Translation unit has OpenMP source)
> Do emit warning.
> else
> Do nothing.
>
> 2. Only -fopenmp is passed
> if (Translation unit has OpenMP source)
> Do process it.
> else
> Do nothing.
>
> 3. Only -fno-openmp is passed
> if (Translation unit has OpenMP source)
> Do nothing
> else
> Do nothing
>
> Note: It is actually no-op.
Not really, it silenced warnings!
In general: this seems to agree with how other -fno-foo options work.
Dmitri
--
main(i,j){for(i=2;;i++){for(j=2;j<i;j++){if(!(i%j)){j=0;break;}}if
(j){printf("%d\n",i);}}} /*Dmitri Gribenko <[email protected]>*/
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
