Wondering if 0 is perhaps more appropriate than a cast, but either way, thanks, Takumi.
On Oct 31, 2012, at 18:47 , NAKAMURA Takumi <[email protected]> wrote: > Author: chapuni > Date: Wed Oct 31 20:47:02 2012 > New Revision: 167199 > > URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=167199&view=rev > Log: > clang/include/clang/StaticAnalyzer/Core/PathSensitive/ConstraintManager.h: > Appease msvc. > > Modified: > > cfe/trunk/include/clang/StaticAnalyzer/Core/PathSensitive/ConstraintManager.h > > Modified: > cfe/trunk/include/clang/StaticAnalyzer/Core/PathSensitive/ConstraintManager.h > URL: > http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/include/clang/StaticAnalyzer/Core/PathSensitive/ConstraintManager.h?rev=167199&r1=167198&r2=167199&view=diff > ============================================================================== > --- > cfe/trunk/include/clang/StaticAnalyzer/Core/PathSensitive/ConstraintManager.h > (original) > +++ > cfe/trunk/include/clang/StaticAnalyzer/Core/PathSensitive/ConstraintManager.h > Wed Oct 31 20:47:02 2012 > @@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ > // FIXME: This is fairly expensive and should be disabled even in > // Release+Asserts builds. > assert(assume(State, Cond, false) && "System is over constrained."); > - return ProgramStatePair(NULL, State); > + return ProgramStatePair((ProgramStateRef)NULL, State); > } > > ProgramStateRef StFalse = assume(State, Cond, false); > @@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ > // We are careful to return the original state, /not/ StTrue, > // because we want to avoid having callers generate a new node > // in the ExplodedGraph. > - return ProgramStatePair(State, NULL); > + return ProgramStatePair(State, (ProgramStateRef)NULL); > } > > return ProgramStatePair(StTrue, StFalse); > > > _______________________________________________ > cfe-commits mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
