On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 07:54:15PM -0800, Richard Smith wrote: > On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 7:14 PM, Rafael Espíndola > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Consider: > >> > >> cat << EOF > test.F > >> PROGRAM HELLOW > >> WRITE(UNIT=*, FMT=*) 'Hello World' > >> END > >> EOF > >> > >> clang-cpp test.F > > > > This used to run > > f951 test.F -cpp=/tmp/ccOj9mhO.f90 -E -quiet -v test.F -o - -m64 > > -mtune=generic -march=x86-64 -fsyntax-only > > > > Now it tries to run clang as a preprocessor and fails because of the > > "-x f95-cpp-input". Is the fortran preprocessor the same as the c one? > > It's similar, but not quite the same. There is a patch to support > Fortran preprocessing in Clang: > > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/cfe-commits/Week-of-Mon-20120430/057199.html > > (There's also Fortran 95's coco preprocessor, which is not the same at > all, but I assume that's not what's wanted here.)
While I think proper support for the Fortran preprocessing rules would be nice, I wonder if reverting this change for clang 3.2 is not the better option? Joerg _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
