> Modified: > cfe/branches/release_32/test/SemaTemplate/instantiate-overload-candidates.cpp > URL: > http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/branches/release_32/test/SemaTemplate/instantiate-overload-candidates.cpp?rev=168830&r1=168829&r2=168830&view=diff > ============================================================================== > --- > cfe/branches/release_32/test/SemaTemplate/instantiate-overload-candidates.cpp > (original) > +++ > cfe/branches/release_32/test/SemaTemplate/instantiate-overload-candidates.cpp > Wed Nov 28 17:44:46 2012 > @@ -19,3 +19,34 @@ > void test(int x) { > f(&x, 0); > } > + > +// Ensure that we instantiate an overloaded function if it's selected by > +// overload resolution when initializing a function pointer. > +template<typename T> struct X { > + static T f() { T::error; } // expected-error {{has no members}} > + static T f(bool); > +}; > +void (*p)() = &X<void>().f; // expected-note {{instantiation of}}
It has been introduced in r167918 and causes failure in release_32. http://bb.pgr.jp/builders/clang-3stage-x86_64-linux/builds/74 -- error: 'error' diagnostics expected but not seen: Line 26: has no members error: 'note' diagnostics expected but not seen: Line 29: instantiation of 2 errors generated. -- Pawel, I suggest you a couple of options; 1) Remove the extra test. 2) Apply Richard's r167918, too. Doug and Richard, how do you think? ...Takumi _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
