> But isn't this a bug in the codegen itself?

  This bug is in the (target-independent) IRGen part of clang. I was referring 
to the target-dependent stuff in LLVM that generates the machine code. This 
confusion is one of the reasons why I support renaming clang's part from 
CodeGen to IRGen ;)

http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D151
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to