Hell if I know. I didn't want to bother with it anymore. -bw
On Dec 17, 2012, at 11:16 AM, Rafael Espíndola <[email protected]> wrote: > This never got added back. What was the problem, just a missing -target? > > On 10 December 2012 17:10, Bill Wendling <[email protected]> wrote: >> Author: void >> Date: Mon Dec 10 16:10:53 2012 >> New Revision: 169778 >> >> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=169778&view=rev >> Log: >> Remove until I can fix this. >> >> Removed: >> cfe/trunk/test/CodeGen/code-coverage.c >> >> Removed: cfe/trunk/test/CodeGen/code-coverage.c >> URL: >> http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/test/CodeGen/code-coverage.c?rev=169777&view=auto >> ============================================================================== >> --- cfe/trunk/test/CodeGen/code-coverage.c (original) >> +++ cfe/trunk/test/CodeGen/code-coverage.c (removed) >> @@ -1,20 +0,0 @@ >> -// RUN: %clang_cc1 -O0 -emit-llvm -disable-red-zone -femit-coverage-notes >> -femit-coverage-data %s -o - | FileCheck %s >> - >> -// <rdar://problem/12843084> >> - >> -int test1(int a) { >> - switch (a % 2) { >> - case 0: >> - ++a; >> - case 1: >> - a /= 2; >> - } >> - return a; >> -} >> - >> -// Check tha the `-mno-red-zone' flag is set here on the generated >> functions. >> - >> -// CHECK: void @__llvm_gcov_indirect_counter_increment(i32* %{{.*}}, i64** >> %{{.*}}) unnamed_addr noinline noredzone >> -// CHECK: void @__llvm_gcov_writeout() unnamed_addr noinline noredzone >> -// CHECK: void @__llvm_gcov_init() unnamed_addr noinline noredzone >> -// CHECK: void @__gcov_flush() unnamed_addr noinline noredzone >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> cfe-commits mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
