On Dec 17, 2012, at 7:53 PM, Sean Silva <[email protected]> wrote: >> But it has its own website, clang-analyzer.llvm.org. > > I'm curious about this. Why is it not sufficient to simply be > clang.llvm.org/analyzer (which works)?
For reference, the fact that this URL works is a curiosity, not something users know about. We don't direct users to that URL. I did not come up with this setup. Apparently it was easier to setup the website this way at the time. If it makes sense to move the analyzer website to a different repository, I am completely in favor of doing so.
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
