The whole point is to get the old URL to do something useful -- either a manual 
redirect or an automatic redirect. If you can make that happen, we're good. :-)

Jordan


On Jan 7, 2013, at 11:21 , Michael Gottesman <[email protected]> wrote:

> How about I create a separate rst file that just consists of said text file 
> i.e. using the ``raw`` directive. Maybe call it Block-ABI-Apple-Text.rst?
> 
> Michael
> 
> On Jan 7, 2013, at 11:13 AM, Jordan Rose <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> It would be if Sphinx copied over stray text files, but would not be if it 
>> does not. OTOH I guess it's already been broken since we first switched to 
>> Sphinx, so maybe it shouldn't block you, but I still think this is 
>> important. I was hoping Sean would have a better appropriate solution.
>> 
>> 
>> On Jan 7, 2013, at 11:10 , Michael Gottesman <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>>> So you did not answer my question. Is that an appropriate solution to your 
>>> objection?
>>> 
>>> = )
>>> 
>>> Michael
>>> 
>>> On Jan 7, 2013, at 10:37 AM, Jordan Rose <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Grr. Sean, does Sphinx not copy over stray text files? That's sort of a 
>>>> problem for URL permanence.
>>>> 
>>>> (I feel like this already came up once; am I wrong about that?)
>>>> 
>>>> Jordan
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Jan 7, 2013, at 10:12 , Michael Gottesman <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> How does this sound:
>>>>> 
>>>>> ``*NOTE* This document has moved to 
>>>>> http://clang.llvm.org/docs/Block-ABI-Apple.html.''
>>>>> 
>>>>> On another note, it seems that 
>>>>> http://clang.llvm.org/docs/Block-ABI-Apple.txt does not exist.
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Jan 7, 2013, at 10:05 AM, Michael Gottesman <[email protected]> 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Ok.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Jan 7, 2013, at 9:43 AM, Jordan Rose <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I don't think we have any mechanism set up for automated redirects, but 
>>>>>>> a simple note in the .txt file saying "This document has moved to ___" 
>>>>>>> would probably be fine (i.e. rather than deleting it). Obviously a 
>>>>>>> redirect would be better but I don't know how to do that.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Jordan
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Jan 7, 2013, at 9:41 , Michael Gottesman <[email protected]> 
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> What do you mean by this specifically (i.e. what would it entail in 
>>>>>>>> terms of this patch).
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Michael
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On Jan 7, 2013, at 9:20 AM, Jordan Rose <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Since this is a spec, we should probably keep the old URL live, even 
>>>>>>>>> if it just points to the generated .html.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Jordan
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> On Jan 6, 2013, at 20:39 , Sean Silva <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> LGTM
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> -- Sean Silva
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 11:22 PM, Michael Gottesman 
>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Subject says it all. Please review:
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Michael
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>> cfe-commits mailing list
>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>> cfe-commits mailing list
>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 
> 

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to