On Jan 16, 2013, at 6:44 AM, Tim Northover <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I'd say that if you can get GCC to make the change, then Clang should do > > the same. If GCC continues to use signed polynomial types, then I'm not > > convinced that Clang should change to unsigned types. > > We've decided to tighten up the AArch32 ABI to require unsigned type for > polynomials. It'll obviously take a while to filter through everywhere, but > the future is unsigned. > > Can I commit? Can I? Can I? *bounce*. > I'd still prefer to get buy-in from GCC first, but if you really want to get it in now, and if no one else objects, than I'm OK with it.
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
