Sure, I believe it ok now to commit.
On 01/21/2013 11:56 AM, Hal Finkel wrote: > > Can you add a test case? > > Thanks again, > Hal
>From 7e9b3f001edee5d489e0217486cd383037e7ddb7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Adhemerval Zanella <[email protected]> Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2012 05:37:16 -0600 Subject: [PATCH] PowerPC: fix __builtin_eh_return_data_regno return --- lib/Basic/Targets.cpp | 5 +++++ test/CodeGen/builtins-ppc.c | 9 +++++++++ 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) create mode 100644 test/CodeGen/builtins-ppc.c diff --git a/lib/Basic/Targets.cpp b/lib/Basic/Targets.cpp index c83165f..084b6b3 100644 --- a/lib/Basic/Targets.cpp +++ b/lib/Basic/Targets.cpp @@ -818,6 +818,11 @@ public: virtual const char *getClobbers() const { return ""; } + int getEHDataRegisterNumber(unsigned RegNo) const { + if (RegNo == 0) return 3; + if (RegNo == 1) return 4; + return -1; + } }; const Builtin::Info PPCTargetInfo::BuiltinInfo[] = { diff --git a/test/CodeGen/builtins-ppc.c b/test/CodeGen/builtins-ppc.c new file mode 100644 index 0000000..ee27a4c --- /dev/null +++ b/test/CodeGen/builtins-ppc.c @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ +// REQUIRES: ppc32-registered-target +// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple powerpc-unknown-unknown -emit-llvm %s -o - | FileCheck %s + +void test_eh_return_data_regno() +{ + volatile int res; + res = __builtin_eh_return_data_regno(0); // CHECK: store volatile i32 3 + res = __builtin_eh_return_data_regno(1); // CHECK: store volatile i32 4 +} -- 1.7.1
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
