On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 11:44 AM, Chandler Carruth <[email protected]>wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 11:07 AM, John McCall <[email protected]> wrote: > >> A significant part of the problem, I believe, is that there's a lot of >> mostly-externally-maintained C code which, at Apple, happens to need to be >> compiled as C++. > > > FWIW, this makes perfect sense, and also makes perfect sense out of a flag > to essentially get C's return semantics in a C++ compilation in order to > support such code. > This is still the wrong direction of the flag. I just haven't seen good justification for changing the compiler in this way to merit the possibility of breaking working code. - Daniel
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
