On Jan 27, 2013, at 1:22 PM, Dmitri Gribenko <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 11:18 PM, Dmitri Gribenko <[email protected]> wrote: >> +struct Foo1 { >> + int iii; >> +}; >> +/** About Foo1T */ >> +typedef struct Foo1 Foo1T; >> +// FIXME: we don't attach this comment to 'struct Foo1' >> +// CHECK: TypedefDecl=Foo1T:[[@LINE-2]]:21 (Definition) {{.*}} >> FullCommentAsHTML=[<p class="para-brief"> About Foo1T </p>] >> FullCommentAsXML=[<Typedef file="{{[^"]+}}annotate-comments-typedef.m" >> line="[[@LINE-2]]" >> column="21"><Name>Foo1T</Name><USR>c:annotate-comments-typedef.m@{{[0-9]+}}@T@Foo1T</USR><Declaration>typedef >> struct Foo1 Foo1T</Declaration><Abstract><Para> About Foo1T >> </Para></Abstract></Typedef>] > > Fariborz, > > Please note this FIXME. I don't think it is easily possible to > support this now. The issue is that when we are looking at the > struct, we don't see any documentation, and we can not "fix it up" This is odd style. I wouldn't be worried about it for now. - Fariborz > later. > > Dmitri > > -- > main(i,j){for(i=2;;i++){for(j=2;j<i;j++){if(!(i%j)){j=0;break;}}if > (j){printf("%d\n",i);}}} /*Dmitri Gribenko <[email protected]>*/ _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
