Actually, while you're here it would be nice to change this to a FileCheck-based test...
On Feb 7, 2013, at 7:11 , Tim Northover <[email protected]> wrote: > Author: tnorthover > Date: Thu Feb 7 09:11:48 2013 > New Revision: 174621 > > URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=174621&view=rev > Log: > Only check for volatile memcpys in test. > > AArch64 handles aggFct's return struct slightly differently, leading > to an extra memcpy. This test is fortunately only concerned about > volatile copies, so we can modify the grep text to filter it. > > Modified: > cfe/trunk/test/CodeGen/volatile.c > > Modified: cfe/trunk/test/CodeGen/volatile.c > URL: > http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/test/CodeGen/volatile.c?rev=174621&r1=174620&r2=174621&view=diff > ============================================================================== > --- cfe/trunk/test/CodeGen/volatile.c (original) > +++ cfe/trunk/test/CodeGen/volatile.c Thu Feb 7 09:11:48 2013 > @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ > // RUN: %clang_cc1 -emit-llvm < %s -o %t > // RUN: grep volatile %t | count 28 > -// RUN: grep memcpy %t | count 7 > +// RUN: grep "memcpy.*, i1 true" %t | count 6 > > // The number 28 comes from the current codegen for volatile loads; > // if this number changes, it's not necessarily something wrong, but > > > _______________________________________________ > cfe-commits mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
