On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 06:30:53PM -0800, John McCall wrote: > On Feb 20, 2013, at 6:24 PM, Richard Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 6:18 PM, John McCall <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Feb 20, 2013, at 6:13 PM, Peter Collingbourne <[email protected]> wrote: > > > http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D443 > > > > Are you sure we actually *want* to expose this to users? > > > > I would like to mark the UBSan runtime handler functions as > > __attribute__((coldcc)), and I think that would make sense for other > > sanitizers too. > > Are we now willing to commit to a fixed ABI for coldcc? I thought we hadn't > been.
Implementing __attribute__((coldcc)) does not necessarily imply fixing the ABI, provided that we document the attribute as such. It should be safe to use in compiler_rt once we modify its build system to use the just-built clang. Thanks, -- Peter _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
