On Feb 27, 2013, at 11:31 AM, John McCall <[email protected]> wrote: > Okay, you're saying that the value is actually no longer live at all at this > point in the function? It seems reasonable to lose track of the debug info > then, although we should be leaving behind a marker in the DWARF that says > the value is unavailable. > > If we want to make stronger guarantees in -O0 for purposes of debugging — and > I think that's reasonable — then throwing the value in an alloca is > acceptable.
To clarify: Are you suggesting to only generate the alloca at -O0, or are you comfortable with it as it is? thanks, Adrian _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
