klimek: I see the point of using DEBUG instead of llvm:outs(), but in this case my intention was to have a summary independent of the way you build source (with assertions) or whether some code underneath is using llvm:dbgs() and polluting the summary. I know that it is not showing too much info now, but the idea is to improve the summary e.g. list of files that changed, etc.. what do you think?
http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D338 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
