On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 7:58 PM, Dmitri Gribenko <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 7:50 PM, David Chisnall <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On 3 Mar 2013, at 16:36, Dmitri Gribenko <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi David,
>>>
>>> I assume you want to check that the output does not contain cmpxchg at
>>> all. If so, unfortunately, this is not how CHECK-NOT works. You need
>>> to do a second FileCheck pass over the output to check that (with a
>>> different prefix, of course).
>>>
>>> Dmitri
>>
>> Huh. Well, the good news is that it's safe to just delete that - it refers
>> to an earlier version of the test. The bad news is that I didn't spot it
>> before committing...
>
> Will you make this change?
Oh, I see -- r176422, sorry.
--
main(i,j){for(i=2;;i++){for(j=2;j<i;j++){if(!(i%j)){j=0;break;}}if
(j){printf("%d\n",i);}}} /*Dmitri Gribenko <[email protected]>*/
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
