On Mar 7, 2013, at 15:53 , Anton Yartsev <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 07.03.2013 21:29, Jordan Rose wrote: >> On Mar 7, 2013, at 4:47 , Anton Yartsev <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Can we just do the Objective-C part first? Can you send that patch too? > Attached. I'll update the main patch after this one gets in. Looking at this again, I think the old logic was right (or at least more conservative). It says that any method with "freeWhenDone" in the name can take ownership (if the param is true), and additionally that any method with "NoCopy" and no "freeWhenDone" will also take ownership. Anna's right that this needs a test case too. Jordan
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
